A common deceptive practice used by most competitive American youth soccer programs is to take as many kids as will register for a particular age group, and then divide them into as many teams as they can make. This is called “player hoarding”; it’s revenue driven and intended to hurt smaller soccer clubs in the local market.
Now, player hoarding doesn’t mean that every single player who shows up to tryouts is offered a spot on a team. Instead, it means that every ounce of talent is taken, leaving nothing to chance. It also means that a player who might be good enough for the “A” team somewhere, will not end up on the “A” team ANYWHERE.
The practice of player hoarding hurts the development of ALL players, because top tier teams aren’t competing against the best-of-the-best all the time, because their best opportunity for completion may be in a lower tier team, in the same club.
Deceptive Player Hoarding Tactics
By the 2nd night of competitive team tryouts – and months before the season starts – EVERY player at tryouts is led to believe that they’ve made an “A” Quality team, so that they won’t tryout anywhere else. Months later – after all of the fees are paid and when training actually starts, players will then be told how the club REALLY feels about them. This is called “ability-grouping”.
If a youth soccer club fields more than 2 competitive teams in any age group, they’re either hoarding talent, or are just focused on revenue. Regardless, know who the coaches are BEFORE paying any fees, to ensure that the focus is on player development, and not trophies for the club.
Another indicator that you’re getting fleeced is if the club has coaches coaching multiple teams. (read “What’s Better…” to understand.
In theory, ability grouping is the grouping of players based on soccer skills. In reality though, ability grouping is the grouping of players based on politics… and soccer skills.
When clubs hoard players, inevitably, one club in the area will struggle to put together just one team in any given age group, therefore requiring players, who might not even be C level, to play A or B level competition. This really hurts the top tier players who can only get better by playing against other top tier players.
State to state, region-wide, many soccer club A teams aren’t true A teams because of player hoarding by more established clubs.
Clubs that hoard players are also hurting their B teams for the very same reasons. Top tier quality players are playing with and against 2nd tier teams and players.
[su_quote cite=”Chief Editor of The Soccer Mom Manual | Mike Slatton”]
I’d rather my son play AGAINST your 1st team than play FOR your 2nd.
[/su_quote] Player hoarding hurts club soccer for the primary reason that you don’t have the best of the best playing competitive youth soccer at the appropriate levels. Instead, you have the most popular club getting the first pick, and taking every skilled player who can afford their fees.How to Identify Hoarders
Any club that has more than 2 teams in age groups U10 to U12, and more than one team in age groups U13 and up is hoarding players, trying to choke out smaller clubs, and hurting competition at every level.
Once the smaller clubs are gone, what’s to stop a club from charging higher fees? NOTHING. They’ll justify the higher fees as necessary for hiring qualified coaches, but read Where Does All the Money Go to find out the real reasons.
Player hoarding hurts ALL of American soccer.
1 Comment
Really interesting read. Thank you for your insight and stating what I thought might be true.